I suspect that Morrison-Reed’s words reach each of us a little differently. What strikes you? I especially like the use of the word ‘consequence’ for such a beautiful concept as universal salvation, which he spells out as “the reality that we share a common destiny.” We are, indeed, in this proverbial boat together.
Morrison-Reed goes on to say: “what we yearn for is unconditional love, but it is contradicted by our experience. Instead, the primary message each of us receives over and over again is: behave and be loved, behave and be loved. The implication is that those who are good and compliant are loved, and all others are not.”
Does this ring true for you? It does for me. Our shared reality is that life is messy and we humans are imperfect. Unfortunately (but not surprisingly), we often take these messy realities of ours and transfer them to our understanding of the divine. “In other words,” Morrison-Reed says, “people have taken their own experience of conditional, judgmental, imperfect human love and ascribed it to God.”
But then there’s the “persistence of Universalism,” drawing us back to the core belief that God is Love. God is not my love or your love. God is pure love and this love refuses to be held back. This love demands nothing of us.
So rather than take our imperfect human reality and ascribe it to God, what would it look like to take the pure love of this Universalist God and ascribe it to our reality?
Morrison-Reed calls it “the Gospel of a larger hope.” He says, “What kind of a God was this” that would “drag the last sinner by his collar…into heaven?” What kind of God indeed. How would your life be different if you lived from this place in every moment? How would our society be structured if we could all live from this place?
For the full article see: www.questformeaning.org/page/reflecting/dragged-kicking-and-screaming-into-heaven